🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.